Eye Care And Primary Care Examinations Assignment

Buy ready-to-submit essays. No Plagiarism Guarantee!

Note: Our papers are 100% human-written. 

Check before you submit. Get Turnitin Score Report in 15 Minutes.

Don't risk the 'Red' score. Get the exact same Turnitin report your professor uses. Join 50,000+ students who submitted their essays with confidence this semester.

Get Turnitin Score Report Request Human Rewrite

Eye Care And Primary Care Examinations Assignment

Change Proposal Summary Report

Executive Summary

Proposed Change

I propose a change that will focus on improving the accessibility of primary care services at the local level. The goal of this change is to ensure there are enough primary care providers designed for the residents and ensure that they access primary and preventive healthcare services in a timely manner. As demonstrated by The Plight of Primary Care, Part 1. (2023), strong primary care networks are imperative. The study assert that lower mortality rates and the costs of care are linked to the increased supply of primary care physicians. The proposed change is therefore supported by this strong evidence. Eye Care And Primary Care Examinations Assignment

ORDER  HERE A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Desired Outcomes

It is important to define the desired outcomes to help in comprehending the goals of the proposed change. The desired goals are a long-term funding plan, better health outcomes, and encountering the factors limiting the achievement.

Improving Health Outcomes: the main objective of the proposed change is the enhancement of health and community well-being. This includes and is not limited to the management of chronic conditions, reduction of mortality and morbidity rates, and early health issues interventions (Spooner et al., 2021). This objective is to ensure that residents receive the necessary healthcare services in a timely manner. The timely reception of healthcare services will promote a healthier and more vibrant community.

Funding for Care: Establishing a healthcare finance paradigm that guarantees everyone in the community receives care without any finance-related barriers is the second most important goal of this change. This model should combine both public and private healthcare financing. It should allow the access of care while maintaining the financial sustainability of the healthcare system. This approach as depicted by Spooner et al. (2021) addresses two issues. These issues are the equitable distribution of healthcare services and healthcare funding. Eye Care And Primary Care Examinations Assignment

Factors limiting achievement

It is imperative to address limiting factors to achieve desired outcomes. These factors include a shortage of primary care providers, prolonged waiting times, and high healthcare costs. These challenges hinder timely and coordinated care. They therefore lead to delayed diagnosis, exacerbated health conditions, and financial barriers. It is necessary to address these issues to create an accessible and high-quality healthcare system. This will foster better health outcomes and sustainable financing.

Health Care System Comparative Analysis

Canada: A Universal Healthcare Model

Canada provides a unique perspective on healthcare accessibility and financing. This system entails a Universal Healthcare Model. It ensures all citizens have access to primary care services without significant financial barriers (Martin et al., 2019). However, this model has faced issues related to prolonged waiting times for non-emergency services. This makes it an insightful case for the proposed change.

Germany: A Mixed Healthcare System with Emphasis on Prevention

Germany’s mixed healthcare system offers a distinct approach to healthcare. Their system combines statutory and private health insurance options.  The system has a strong primary care network that emphasizes preventive care and prompt access to services. The German system corresponds nicely with the proposed changes as it emphasizes preventative health interventions (Blumel et al., 2020). Eye Care And Primary Care Examinations Assignment

Comparative Analysis: Canada vs. Germany

The comparison that arises from the two systems provides valuable insights. It is evident that Canada is struggling with wait times. Germany, on the other hand, excels in timely access to services and preventive care. These insights demonstrate the significance of not only universal access but also the role of prevention in achieving better health outcomes.

Comparison with Local/Regional System

Both Canada and Germany demonstrate successful models in comparison to our local/regional system. Our system currently faces issues related to uninsured populations and overcrowded emergency rooms due to inadequate primary care. The analysis underscores the potential for positive change through improved primary care accessibility and preventive measures.

Rationale for the Proposed Change

The expected improvements in outcomes include reduced mortality rates, improved health outcomes, and overall better well-being for the community. Additionally, there will be cost savings through early intervention and a reduced burden on emergency services. Studies have demonstrated that investment in primary care leads to cost savings and improved health outcomes. For example, a study by Pang et al. (2020) found that increased primary care access was associated with lower healthcare costs. Another study by Savoy et al. (2017), published in JAMA Internal Medicine, demonstrated that timely access to primary care was linked to better management of chronic conditions. Eye Care And Primary Care Examinations Assignment

Financial and Health Implications

Implications of Making the Changes

The proposed changes demand swift investments in workforce expansion and healthcare infrastructure. Making these changes will lead to better health outcomes and less demand on emergency services. Implementing these changes will lead to a healthier community and a more affordable healthcare system. The investments seek to produce long-term benefits that exceed the cost through addressing the limitations in our current system.

Implications of Not Making the Changes

There could be a persistence in the burden on emergency services if the changes are not made. This could lead to increased healthcare costs resulting to worse community health outcomes. If primary care services are not timely accessed, some conditions may worsen. This could mean more expensive, more intense treatment. Failure to make the changes could make

the problems faced by our current healthcare system to persist. This could have detrimental effects on the community’s overall health and its financial stability.

ORDER HERE

Likely Costs and Benefits for Individuals and the Community

The likely costs are the initial investment in healthcare infrastructure and workforce expansion. This may potentially boost healthcare expenditures during the transition phase. Both individuals and the larger community will benefit from the proposed change. These most immediate benefit is improved health outcomes. Having an improved health outcome indicates that there will be lower long-term healthcare costs. The goal is to generate a healthier population while reducing the economic and social costs associated with limited access to healthcare services. Eye Care And Primary Care Examinations Assignment

Short- and Long-Term Effects

The potential short-term effects are the need for increased healthcare funding and reallocation of resources to accommodate the proposed changes. The long-term perspective is more optimistic although these measures may initially strain the healthcare budget. The community is expected to experience significant cost savings. This will be achieved through the prevention of costly health conditions and more efficient resource allocation. Improved health outcomes and the effective management of healthcare services are anticipated to foster a more efficient healthcare system.

A wealth of evidence substantiates the proposed changes’ potential benefits. Tzenios (2019) highlights that investments in primary care systems lead to substantial cost savings and improved health outcomes. Brekke (2023) emphasizes the correlation between a strong primary care system and better health outcomes and lower healthcare costs. The evidence-based nature of these conclusions reinforces the viability of the proposed changes, emphasizing their potential to enhance the financial and health landscape of our healthcare system. Eye Care And Primary Care Examinations Assignment

Conclusion

In conclusion, the proposed change is vital for achieving better health outcomes in our regional healthcare system. The comparative analysis of the Canadian and German healthcare systems demonstrates the positive impact of strong primary care networks. Implementing this change is an imperative step towards affordable, high-quality care, and continual improvement. Even though the implementation will require a financial commitment, the long-term benefits for the community and the healthcare system far outweigh the initial costs. Not making this change could perpetuate the issues in our current system. This could result in increased healthcare costs and poorer health outcomes. Eye Care And Primary Care Examinations Assignment

Appendix

Table 1: Health Care System Comparative Analysis

References

Blumel, M., Spranger, A., Achstetter, K., Maresso, A., & Busse, R. (2020). Germany: health system review.

Brekke, G. (2023). Patient Selection and Impacts of Plan Choice on Specialty, Urgent Care Center and Emergency Department Visits and Total Expenditures when Families Choose Between a Direct Primary Care Option and a Traditional Option for Employee Medical Benefits (Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas).

Martin, D., Miller, A. P., Quesnel-Vallée, A., Caron, N. R., Vissandjée, B., & Marchildon, G. P. (2018). Canada’s universal health-care system: achieving its potential. The Lancet, 391(10131), 1718-1735. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30181-8

Pang, Y., Ren, Z., & Wang, J. (2020). Impact of the affordable care act on utilization of benefits of eye care and primary care examinations. PLoS One, 15(11), e0241475. https://doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0241475

Savoy, M., FAAFP, FABC, CPE, CMQ, FAAPL, Hazlett-O’Brien, C., & Rapacciuolo, J. (2017). The Role of Primary Care Physicians in Managing Chronic Disease. Delaware journal of public health, 3(1), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.32481/djph.2017.03.012

Spooner, C., Lewis, V., Scott, C., Dahrouge, S., Haggerty, J., Russell, G., … & IMPACT team. (2021). Improving access to primary health care: a cross-case comparison based on an a priori program theory. International Journal for Equity in Health, 20, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01508-0

The Plight of Primary Care, Part 1. (2023). The New England journal of medicine, 389(1), e1. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2303852

Tzenios, N. (2019). The Determinants of Access to Healthcare: A Review of Individual, Structural, and Systemic Factors. Journal of Humanities and Applied Science Research, 2(1), 1-14. Eye Care And Primary Care Examinations Assignment

Your organization, in collaboration with key stakeholders from the community, is funding an initiative to investigate potential improvements in the local or regional health care system. As a nurse leader attuned to the effects of health care policy and finance on the provision of affordable, high-quality care, you have been asked to join the task force conducting the study.
You know that an examination of other countries†health care systems can provide a solid, evidence-based foundation for evaluating outcomes and identifying benchmarks. Consequently, you have decided to undertake a comparative analysis of selected, non-U.S. health care systems and compare them to each other and to the current local or regional U.S. system to help inform decision making as the task force considers proposed changes Eye Care And Primary Care Examinations Assignment