Comparison of Nursing Theories Discussion

Buy ready-to-submit essays. No Plagiarism Guarantee!

Note: Our papers are 100% human-written. 

Check before you submit. Get Turnitin Score Report in 15 Minutes.

Don't risk the 'Red' score. Get the exact same Turnitin report your professor uses. Join 50,000+ students who submitted their essays with confidence this semester.

Get Turnitin Score Report Request Human Rewrite

Comparison of Nursing Theories Discussion ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Comparison of Nursing Theories Discussion Comparison of Nursing Theories It is possible to detect both diversities and similarities between the theories of human becoming and unitary human, developed by Rosemarie Rizzo Parse’s and Martha E. Rogers’, respectively, if to conduct their comparison. The first major difference is that the focus of Parse’s theory is directed on the quality of living from each person’s viewpoint, while Rogers’ theory identifies the only focus of nursing as “the irreducible human being and its environment, both defined as energy fields” (Petiprin, b, 2016; Smith & Parker, 2014, p. 238). The second diversity between these theories is their basic concepts, where the Parse’s theory is regulated by the ideas of purpose, rhythmicity, and transcendence (Petiprin, b, 2016). At the same time, Rogers’ framework is presented by such concepts as an “energy field, openness, pattern, pan-dimensionality, homodynamic principles, resonance, helicy, and integrality” (Petiprin, a, 2016). However, these two theories also have a common point. It may be detected in how the theorists of both directions view people as unitary beings, who consist of physiological, psychological, cultural, and spiritual factors (Petiprin, b, 2016). If to choose which one of the theories was more appropriate for my nursing practice, I would prefer being guided by Parse’s theory of nursing. First, it is because this theory is a mixture of different realms of healthcare and does not favor any factors, which determine human life. Secondly, the image of the human as a creature of “body-mind-spirit whose health is considered a state of biological, psychological, social, and spiritual well-being” is closer to the views I have always had on the nature of health (Smith & Parker, 2014, p. 264-265). Therefore, among the two compared theoretical frameworks, I would choose the Parse’s human becoming paradigm of nursing for my practice because it is more universal and more corresponding to my personal views on nursing. References Petiprin, A., a. (2016). Rogers’ theory of unitary human beings. Nursing Theory . Retrieved from https://nursing-theory.org/theories-and-models/rog… Petiprin, A., b. (2016). Rosemarie Rizzo Parse. Nursing Theory . Retrieved from https://nursing-theory.org/nursing-theorists/Rosem… Smith, M. & Parker, M. (2014). Nursing theories and nursing practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company. Attachment: Week 7 Discussion Post Nursing theory.docx (21.963 KB) Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10