Honolulu and Hudson River Tunnel Projects Discussion

Buy ready-to-submit essays. No Plagiarism Guarantee!

Note: Our papers are 100% human-written. 

Check before you submit. Get Turnitin Score Report in 15 Minutes.

Don't risk the 'Red' score. Get the exact same Turnitin report your professor uses. Join 50,000+ students who submitted their essays with confidence this semester.

Get Turnitin Score Report Request Human Rewrite

Honolulu and Hudson River Tunnel Projects Discussion ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Honolulu and Hudson River Tunnel Projects Discussion 1. Please see the attachment for questions 2. APA Format 3. References attachment_1 Activity I Case 13.3 “Dear Mr. President—Please Cancel our Project!”: The Honolulu Elevated Rail Project. Honolulu and Hudson River Tunnel Projects Discussion This case is a great current example of a very expensive project that was kicked off because of an assumed need—to relieve congestion in downtown Honolulu through an elevated urban rail system. Critics argue that in addition to having a ballooning cost, the actual planning was poorly conceived, leaving Honolulu with an intrusive and ugly rail system through the downtown area, ruining panoramic views, and impeding traffic. Additionally, advocates underestimated the power needs for the rail system, requiring the transport authority to renegotiate electricity fees for the system. Finally, the original costs that were assumed for the project were calculated during an economic downturn and with the economy booming again, the costs of the project have gone up dramatically. All of these elements points to a state Governor who is anxious to be rid of the project and hoping that President Trump will deny additional federal funding, in which case the project will likely be cancelled. Questions Why are public works projects like the Honolulu Rail project nearly impossible to stop once they have been approved, even if later cost estimates skyrocket? Project Management researchers have charged that many large infrastructure projects, like this one, suffer from “delusion” and “deception” on the parts of their advocates. Explain how “delusion” might be a cause of ballooning budgets in this project. How does “deception” affect the final project budget overruns? Case Study 14.1—New Jersey Kills Hudson River Tunnel Project This case illustrates the challenges in making an early termination decision. Often, particularly in the case of public projects, there is a real difficulty in stopping a project once it has gotten “on the books.” As a result, projects with huge cost overruns, like Boston’s “Big Dig” are allowed to continue almost indefinitely. New Jersey Governor Chris Christie made a tough call in deciding to cancel the Hudson River Tunnel project because he was given a number of rosy projections that did not match the actual costs incurred to that date. This is a great case to let students pick sides: should Christie have cancelled the project or not? There are arguments to be made that the need was strong (although others could argue that the need was over-sold). On the other hand, the history of the project to date and the uncertainty about future federal funding made it a real gamble, especially during a time of economic recession. Questions How would you respond to the argument that it is impossible to judge how successful a project like this one would have been unless you actually do it? Take a position, either pro or con, on Christie’s decision to kill the ARC. Develop arguments to support your point of view. In your opinion, how clearly must a large infrastructure project like ARC have determined its need, costs, and so forth before being approved? If the criteria are too stringent, what is the implication for future projects of this type? Would any ever be built? Activity II Instructions: Continuing to use the Week 2 Business Case project the exercise this week will require you to complete a scope statement similar to Exhibit 7.4 on page 219 of the textbook. Do not mimic the items provided in the Exhibit; you must identify those specific to your project. Copy and paste the Business Case you completed on Week 2 into the section below. Draft a two or three sentence scope description for this project. Provide six (6) key deliverables that are required to consider the project to have been completed successfully. Then state what the Acceptance Criteria entails to consider these Key Deliverables completed. Deliverables and Acceptance Criteria need to follow SMART criteria. That means that these need to be Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Timely. This exercise only needs to identify six (6) of the potential Deliverables needed in the project. It does not mean to identify six (6) deliverables to complete the whole project. These Deliverables will be utilized to create a future WBS with Activity List. So again, be specific and utilize SMART criteria. As an example, if your Project was to build a wooden fence around a field then one of your Key Deliverables would be: Install Fence Posts. The Acceptance Criteria could be: Five-foot fence posts have been installed every eight feet around the field. Posts are properly secured in concrete and plumb. (This could be more specific but this is sufficient for the exercise). The final step will to be to define and identify Exclusions, Constraints and Assumptions. First, briefly define what these concepts are utilizing material from the weekly reading (textbook) in support of creating your definition. Then identify these items within the scope of your project and explain why these elements have been identified. Business Case (copy and paste): News source (APA reference): HOLBROOK, E. (2020, July 27). Two major solar projects now under construction in North Carolina. Environment + Energy Leader. https://www.environmentalleader.com/2020/07/two-major-solar-projects-now-under-construction-in-north-carolina/ Web address: https://www.environmentalleader.com/2020/07/two-major-solar-projects-now-under-construction-in-north-carolina/ City: Charlotte Elevator Pitch (100 words exactly): The new firm plan is set to extend the operations to increase production and sales to meet the market demands. The new plant will enhance current brands offered by the firm. It will be located in California. The project will kick off by 18th December 2020. The premises are situated on 13 acres of land. The project will cost $997 million. $700 million will come from the company profits. The rest will be raised through debt-equity. The extension of the project is expected to increase employees’ numbers by 5000 more workers. However, there are risks that prices may go higher based on current inflation rates. Project Scope Statement Scope Description: Key Deliverables with acceptance criteria (product scope): KEY DELIVERABLES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Exclusions Define: Identify and Explain: Constraints Define: Identify and Explain: Assumptions Define: Identify and Explain: Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10