INDEPENDENT PROJECT RUBRIC AND INSTRUCTIONS

Order ID: DHT6H23GDHY82HD	Delivery: 3 HOURS & ABOVE	Writer Classification: PHD-PROFICIENT
Formatting Style: APA/HARVARD/MLA	Plagiarism Grading: 0-0.3%	Quality Standard: 99.999%
Sources: 3-7	Course Level: UNIVERSITY/COLLEGE	Revision Request: ALLOWED

Buy ready-to-submit essays. No Plagiarism Guarantee!

Note: Our papers are 100% human-written. 

Check before you submit. Get Turnitin Score Report in 15 Minutes.

Don't risk the 'Red' score. Get the exact same Turnitin report your professor uses. Join 50,000+ students who submitted their essays with confidence this semester.

Get Turnitin Score Report Request Human Rewrite

Instructions: 

INDEPENDENT PROJECT RUBRIC AND INSTRUCTIONS

Find two peer-reviewed journal articles that examine the same hypothesis, using different study designs. The project should total approximately 5 pages. Citations in the text and references must be in APA format.

Instructions

Independent Project

Find two primary peer-reviewed journal articles (No meta-analysis or review articles and must be based from the UNITED STATES) that examine the same hypothesis, using different study designs. For example, one article may use a cohort design and the other a case-control study, or randomized clinical trial, or cross-sectional, etc..

For each article:

1. State the research objective
2. Describe the study design, including their target population, sampling methodology, sample size, recruiting methods, inclusion/exclusion criteria, etc.
3. Summarize the results, including univariate and multivariate findings, if applicable. What variables did hey control for, and were the findings different after controlling for confounding variables than before they controlled for them?
4. State the article’s conclusions as they relate to the original (null) hypothesis.
5. Discuss the study’s strengths and limitations, including sources of bias or possible confounding. How did they account for these issues, and how might they have affected the results (bias toward vs. away from the null hypothesis)?
6. Were their conclusions generalizable to the overall population? Why or why not?

Finally, compare the two articles.

1. Did they reach the same or different conclusions? If different, what may have contributed to the discrepancy (chance, methodology, bias)?
2. Which study had the superior methodology, and why?
3. Which one are you more likely to believe?
4. How would you design the ideal study to examine this hypothesis?

Course Learning Outcomes:

Upon completion of this course, the student will be able to:

• Appropriately use and understand epidemiological terminology.
• Determine appropriate epidemiological study designs
• Identify sources of bias in public health research.
• Discuss the steps of a disease outbreak investigation
• Critically review the public health literature.

RUBRIC

	ORGANIZATION	FOLLOWING OF INSTRUCTIONS	NEATNESS AND OTHERS
EXCELLENT 75-100%	An essay categorized as excellent demonstrated a profound mastery of the subject matter, coupled with an exceptional ability to organize thoughts coherently. This work showcased a sophisticated understanding of the topic, presenting nuanced arguments with clarity and precision. The structure was impeccable, with a well-defined introduction, body, and conclusion. Critical analysis was evident throughout, reflecting a deep engagement with relevant literature. The essay not only met but exceeded the expected standards, demonstrating a high level of scholarship and intellectual rigor.	An essay categorized as excellent in terms of following instructions demonstrates an exemplary adherence to guidelines. The writer meticulously follows each directive, showcasing a keen attention to detail and a comprehensive understanding of the assignment’s requirements. From formatting to specific content criteria, every instruction is not only met but exceeded, reflecting a dedication to precision. Such essays not only fulfill the given parameters but also exhibit a level of thoroughness that goes beyond expectations.	In the classification of “Neatness and Others,” top-tier works exhibit exceptional attention to detail and precision in presentation. These essays are immaculately organized, with a visually appealing layout and a meticulous approach to formatting. Neatness extends to language usage, where clarity and conciseness prevail. Citations and references are flawlessly integrated, showcasing a commitment to academic integrity. These essays go beyond the surface, incorporating additional elements like illustrative visuals or supplementary materials, enhancing the overall quality of presentation.
AVERAGE 40-74%	In the realm of an average essay, a moderate proficiency in the subject matter was observed. While the writer demonstrated a basic understanding of the topic, there were occasional lapses in organization and coherence. Arguments and analysis were presented, but there was room for improvement in terms of depth and clarity. The structure was adequate but lacked the refinement seen in higher-quality essays. Overall, the essay met the basic requirements but fell short of achieving a more polished and insightful presentation.	In the realm of an average essay regarding following instructions, there is a moderate adherence to guidelines. While the writer generally complies with the given instructions, there may be occasional deviations or oversights. The essay meets the basic requirements but lacks the meticulous attention to detail seen in higher-quality submissions. Despite a reasonable attempt to follow instructions, there is room for improvement in terms of ensuring a more precise alignment with the provided guidelines.	Essays falling into the average category regarding “Neatness and Others” demonstrate a moderate level of attention to detail. The organization is generally tidy, but there may be occasional lapses in formatting or presentation. Language usage is adequate, although there is room for improvement in terms of clarity and conciseness. Citations and references are appropriately included, but not with the finesse seen in higher-quality works. While meeting basic standards, these essays lack the polish and meticulousness associated with top-tier neatness.
GOOD QUALITY 0-39%	An essay categorized as good quality displayed a solid understanding of the subject matter. The writer effectively communicated their ideas, presenting a coherent and well-organized piece of work. While not reaching the level of excellence, this essay exhibited a commendable effort in critical analysis and argumentation. The structure was generally sound, with a clear introduction, development of ideas in the body, and a reasonable conclusion. With minor enhancements in depth and refinement, this essay had the potential to elevate to a higher quality.	An essay categorized as good quality in following instructions displays a solid effort in adhering to guidelines. The writer demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of the given instructions, with overall compliance. While there may be some minor lapses, the essay generally meets the specified criteria. With a bit more attention to detail and precision in following instructions, these essays have the potential to elevate to a higher quality in terms of adherence to guidelines.	In the realm of “Good Quality” for Neatness and Others, essays display a solid effort in organization and presentation. The layout is generally tidy, with a clear structure and acceptable formatting. Language usage is effective, though some areas may benefit from increased clarity. Citations and references are included appropriately, though not with the precision seen in top-tier works. With minor refinements in organization and attention to detail, these essays have the potential to enhance their overall neatness and move towards a higher quality classification.

https://criticalassignment.com

https://essayshredder.com/orders/ordernow

The post INDEPENDENT PROJECT RUBRIC AND INSTRUCTIONS appeared first on Critical Assignment.